--- id: disposition-matchup/reconnaissance--vs--priority-assets kind: matchup-analysis lang: en title: "Reconnaissance vs Priority Assets — Search and Scour / Vanguard Operation" subjects: - gdm:disposition/reconnaissance - gdm:disposition/priority-assets - gdm:primary/reconnaissance/search-and-scour - gdm:primary/priority-assets/vanguard-operation sides: side0: disposition: reconnaissance card: gdm:primary/reconnaissance/search-and-scour scoringCheckpoint: mixed holdWindow: 0 side1: disposition: priority-assets card: gdm:primary/priority-assets/vanguard-operation scoringCheckpoint: command-phase holdWindow: 1 ratings: - metric: edge value: 11 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "Search and Scour banks 7 VP a turn from its own half and the centre against Vanguard Operation's 4, but the printed clause diff runs 6 VP the other way and published competitive readings call this cell slightly Priority-favoured. A slight Reconnaissance edge, held loosely, and the first cell to revisit once games exist." - metric: ceiling side: 0 value: 15 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "4 VP per objective plus a central bonus, a kill rider and a 5 VP finish." - metric: ceiling side: 1 value: 15 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "A 10 VP finish plus 4 VP a turn of actions and a flat hold line." - metric: floor side: 0 value: 14 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "Per-objective scoring rewards the board play the army is already doing." - metric: floor side: 1 value: 11 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "The flat hold and the action are reliable; the finish is all or nothing." - metric: tempo side: 0 value: 9 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "The main engine is a Command-phase checkpoint." - metric: tempo side: 1 value: 12 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "Actions and kills resolve at the end of your turn, and the finish rewards a last-turn strike." - metric: complexity side: 0 value: 8 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "Standard objective play plus one end-of-battle sweep to remember." - metric: complexity side: 1 value: 11 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "Action every turn plus a carefully timed raid." - metric: exposure side: 0 value: 12 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "A per-objective engine rewards ordinary board play, and the end-of-battle sweep of your own territory happens on friendly ground." - metric: activationCost side: 0 value: 11 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "1 unit must be kept back for the final sweep." - metric: exposure side: 1 value: 15 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "A vanguard operation every turn plus a 10 VP end-of-battle raid on the enemy home objective — the most exposed square measured on these layouts." - metric: activationCost side: 1 value: 15 confidence: medium basis: theory rationale: "One acting unit per turn, plus the reserved raid package." claims: - type: engine-note phase: end-of-battle text: "The two end-of-battle clauses are in direct opposition: Priority Assets scores 10 VP for controlling the Reconnaissance home objective, Reconnaissance scores 5 VP for having no enemy unit wholly within its territory. 1 round-5 sweep decides a 15 VP swing." - type: engine-note side: 0 phase: whole-game text: "Search and Scour is the only Reconnaissance card with a per-objective Command-phase engine, so unlike the rest of the deck this build genuinely wants breadth." - type: pitfall side: 0 phase: rounds-4-5 text: "The Reconnaissance player who commits every unit forward loses both their own 5 VP finish and 10 VP to the raid." - type: cost side: 0 phase: whole-game text: "This card moves its checkpoint during the game, so the same grab costs a full enemy turn early and nothing late — price the grab accordingly before committing a unit to it." - type: cost side: 1 phase: whole-game text: "This card scores at your Command phase, so an objective taken on your turn only pays if it survives a full enemy turn (hold window 1) — price the grab accordingly before committing a unit to it." - type: terrain phase: deployment text: "Measured across all 45 transcribed layouts: a central objective can be held from a spot only 4.6% of the enemy deployment zone can see (best board 0%), while taking an enemy home objective means standing where a median of 47.7% of their deployment zone has line of sight, rising to 91.7% on the most exposed board. Cards that pay for enemy home objectives are charging you that difference, and the board decides the price." refs: - rule:13.08 - rule:14.02 - type: disruption side: 0 phase: whole-game text: "Their finish is 10 VP for holding your home objective, and yours is 5 VP for having their units out of your half. Those are the same fight, worth 15 VP together, decided in round 5 — so keep a fast unit uncommitted for it and do not spend it earlier. Their other half is the vanguard action every turn: kill the actor, or engage it, and 4 VP a turn stops. Their hold line is flat, so contesting beyond their first objective achieves nothing." - type: list-building side: 0 phase: list-building text: "Reconnaissance needs: Board presence — this card scales, so bodies on markers pay. One fast unit held back specifically to clear your own territory in round 5. It is worth 15 VP of swing. Reach into terrain areas for the 2 VP kill rider; their action units will be sitting in cover. A home screen, because their finish targets it." - type: disruption side: 1 phase: whole-game text: "Their engine scales at 4 VP per objective, so every marker you contest is worth a full 4 VP — unusually, contesting pays you as much as holding. Their 5 VP finish needs no enemy unit wholly within their territory, so even a surviving cheap unit that fails to take the objective still denies it. Send two threats if you can: one to take the objective, one simply to exist in their half." - type: list-building side: 1 phase: list-building text: "Priority Assets needs: A deep-strike or fast package for the round-5 raid, protected all game. A second, cheaper body that only has to be alive in their half at the end — it denies 5 VP by itself. Two or 3 units able to perform the vanguard action on rotation. Just 1 objective holder; the hold line is flat." - type: layout phase: deployment text: "All three boards for this pairing are transcribed and measured. Layout 1 (bands on the short edges) reads 5/20 for openness, Layout 2 (diagonal across the long axis) reads 4/20 for openness, Layout 3 (diagonal across the short axis) reads 4/20 for openness. Taking a home marker off the opponent costs 27.1% deployment-zone exposure on Layout 2 and 38.5% on Layout 1 — the same play, priced very differently. Central markers stay the safest ground on all three, bottoming out at 1.6% on Layout 2." listRequirements: - side: 0 role: "Board presence" trait: - expendable-bodies - objective-control phase: list-building why: "Board presence — this card scales, so bodies on markers pay." - side: 0 role: "One fast unit held back specifically to clear your own territory in round 5" count: 1 trait: - speed phase: list-building why: "One fast unit held back specifically to clear your own territory in round 5." - side: 0 role: "It is worth 15 VP of swing" trait: - objective-control phase: list-building why: "It is worth 15 VP of swing." - side: 0 role: "Reach into terrain areas for the 2 VP kill rider" count: 2 trait: - concealment - damage - reach phase: list-building why: "Reach into terrain areas for the 2 VP kill rider; their action units will be sitting in cover." - side: 0 role: "A home screen, because their finish targets it" trait: - screening phase: list-building why: "A home screen, because their finish targets it." - side: 1 role: "A deep-strike or fast package for the round-5 raid" count: 5 trait: - speed phase: list-building why: "A deep-strike or fast package for the round-5 raid, protected all game." - side: 1 role: "A second" count: 5 trait: - expendable-bodies phase: list-building why: "A second, cheaper body that only has to be alive in their half at the end — it denies 5 VP by itself." - side: 1 role: "Two or 3 units able to perform the vanguard action on rotation" count: 2 trait: - action-recycling phase: list-building why: "Two or 3 units able to perform the vanguard action on rotation." - side: 1 role: "Just 1 objective holder" count: 1 trait: - objective-control phase: list-building why: "Just 1 objective holder; the hold line is flat." - side: 1 role: "A reactive threat that makes the approach cost something" count: 1 trait: - reactive-deterrence phase: rounds-2-3 why: "This card checks its hold at the Command phase, so every grab has to live through a full enemy turn. Heroic Intervention, Fire Overwatch and Counter-Offensive make that survivable by taxing the commit instead of answering it after the fact — cheaper than buying enough wounds to tank it." - side: 1 role: "1 unit expensive to remove, and concealment for everything else" count: 1 trait: - concealment - durability phase: whole-game vpAtStake: 8 why: "Their kill clause names WHERE the victim has to be, which hands you target selection: present 1 unit that costs more to remove than it is worth, keep the rest Hidden or in cover, and the 2 VP a turn simply does not fire." dependsOn: corpus: "2026-05-09 23:42:21" gdmPack: "GDM" status: draft sources: [] --- ## The matchup in a nutshell Similar totals, opposite shapes — and a genuinely dramatic ending. Reconnaissance gets the scaling engine, 4 VP per objective checked every Command phase. Priority Assets buys its points with actions and one enormous finish. Both end-of-battle clauses ask the same question from opposite sides, and 15 VP rides on whether a single unit is still standing in the Reconnaissance player's half in round 5. | | Reconnaissance | Priority Assets | |---|---|---| | Card | Search and Scour | Vanguard Operation | | Scores at | mixed | command phase | | Hold window | 0 enemy turns | 1 enemy turn | | Exposure | 12/20 | 15/20 | | Activation cost | 11/20 | 15/20 | A hold window of 1 cuts both ways, and most players only think about one of them. It means your grab has to survive a full enemy turn before it pays — but it also means **you get a whole turn to shoot theirs off the marker before they bank it**. Denial is not a side quest on this card; it is half the card. ## Playing Reconnaissance *Your card: Search and Scour. Scoring checkpoint: mixed. Hold window: 0 enemy turns.* ### How you score 3 VP any turn you hold a central objective, 2 VP for killing an enemy that started the turn inside a terrain area, 4 VP per objective at your Command phase — the only Reconnaissance card that genuinely rewards breadth — and 5 VP at the end of battle if no enemy unit is wholly within your territory. ### What it costs you Ordinary board play, which is why this is the most comfortable Reconnaissance card to run. The one discipline is keeping enough mobility back to sweep your own half on the last turn. Exposure 12/20, activation cost 11/20. ### How you break them Their finish is 10 VP for holding **your** home objective, and yours is 5 VP for having their units out of your half. Those are the same fight, worth 15 VP together, decided in round 5 — so keep a fast unit uncommitted for it and do not spend it earlier. Their other half is the vanguard action every turn: kill the actor, or engage it, and 4 VP a turn stops. Their hold line is flat, so contesting beyond their first objective achieves nothing. ### What your list needs - Board presence — this card scales, so bodies on markers pay. - One fast unit held back specifically to clear your own territory in round 5. It is worth 15 VP of swing. - Reach into terrain areas for the 2 VP kill rider; their action units will be sitting in cover. - A home screen, because their finish targets it. ## Playing Priority Assets *Your card: Vanguard Operation. Scoring checkpoint: command phase. Hold window: 1 enemy turn.* ### How you score 4 VP any turn a unit performs a vanguard operation, 2 VP any turn something of theirs dies, 4 VP at your Command phase for holding anything, and **10 VP at the end of battle for holding their home objective**. ### What it costs you One acting unit per turn, plus a reserved raid package that spends the whole game not fighting. Your recurring scoring is safe; your finish is not. Exposure 15/20, activation cost 15/20. ### How you break them Their engine scales at 4 VP per objective, so every marker you contest is worth a full 4 VP — unusually, contesting pays you as much as holding. Their 5 VP finish needs **no** enemy unit wholly within their territory, so even a surviving cheap unit that fails to take the objective still denies it. Send two threats if you can: one to take the objective, one simply to exist in their half. ### What your list needs - A deep-strike or fast package for the round-5 raid, protected all game. - A second, cheaper body that only has to be alive in their half at the end — it denies 5 VP by itself. - Two or 3 units able to perform the vanguard action on rotation. - Just 1 objective holder; the hold line is flat. ## The three layouts Reconnaissance vs Priority Assets is played on one of three boards, and they are not the same game. All three are transcribed and measured below. | Board | Deployment | Openness | Centre exposure | Cost to raid a home marker | No-man's-land | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Layout 1 | bands on the short edges | 5/20 | 4.6% | 38.5% | 10.2% | | Layout 2 | diagonal across the long axis | 4/20 | 1.6% | 27.1% | — | | Layout 3 | diagonal across the short axis | 4/20 | 2.6% | 28.5% | — | - **Layout 1** — bands on the short edges, openness **5/20**. The middle is free real estate: there is a legal spot within range of a central marker that only **4.6%** of the enemy deployment zone can see. Raiding a home marker costs **38.5%** exposure — real, but payable with one screened unit. No-man's-land markers sit at **10.2%**. 74% of the legal holding spots can go fully out of sight — pick the spot, not the marker. - **Layout 2** — diagonal across the long axis, openness **4/20**. The middle is free real estate: there is a legal spot within range of a central marker that only **1.6%** of the enemy deployment zone can see. Raiding a home marker costs **27.1%** exposure — real, but payable with one screened unit. Almost anywhere you stand near a marker (87% of legal spots) can be put fully out of sight. - **Layout 3** — diagonal across the short axis, openness **4/20**. The middle is free real estate: there is a legal spot within range of a central marker that only **2.6%** of the enemy deployment zone can see. Raiding a home marker costs **28.5%** exposure — real, but payable with one screened unit. Almost anywhere you stand near a marker (94% of legal spots) can be put fully out of sight. If your plan needs enemy ground, **Layout 2** is where it is cheapest (27.1% exposure against 38.5% on Layout 1) — the same raid can be a bargain or a suicide depending on which board you drew. Numbers are measured on the transcribed sheets: every legal spot within control range of each marker is tested, and the best one is reported — the way a real player looks for the safest place to stand, not the middle of the marker. ## Decision points - Rounds 2-3 — Reconnaissance takes ground, Priority Assets banks actions. - Round 4 — the raid deploys; Reconnaissance identifies its sweeper. - Round 5 — plan the order of activations, not just the moves. Both finishes resolve here.